Methodology
Mohave County, AZ · How project cost becomes unit obligation
Readiness
The assessment methodology is decided
The named method and its rationale are recorded as an accountable project decision.
The ratio threshold is decided
The threshold used for every assessment-unit test is recorded as an accountable project decision.
Method
Waterline frontage
Custom method
Front footage on the improved main, per the design report.
- Decided by
- Freeboard demonstration fixture
- Decided at
- Aug 18, 2026, 5:00 PM MST
- Decision note
- Recorded before the roll was computed.
Funding
- Cost subtotal
- $4,623,000.00
- Less grants
- -$1,400,000.00
- Less cash participation
- $0.00
- To be assessed
- $3,223,000.00
- Capitalized interest
- $301,000.00
- Total to bond
- $3,524,000.00
Components
| Details | Component | Construction | Incidentals | Grants applied | Cash participation | To be assessed | Rate per measure | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waterline extension | $4,020,000.00 | $603,000.00 | Not computed | Not computed | Not computed | Not computed | 96 |
Validation
Calculation reconciliation
Calculate a Roll revision to validate component and project reconciliation.
Basis intake
Basis file intake
Bring EDU, frontage, and participation tags into the working assessment from a neutral CSV. Freeboard previews every source row and records accepted bytes as evidence before Roll recomputation.
Traceability
Decision and source chain
- Roster source
- maricopa-gis county roster
- Roster evidence
- https://gis.mcassessor.maricopa.gov/
- Method decision
- Freeboard demonstration fixture · Aug 18, 2026, 5:00 PM MST
- Plan decision
- Freeboard demonstration fixture · Aug 18, 2026, 5:00 PM MST
- Plan source note
- Component costs and the funding ladder as bid and awarded.
- Calculation
- No computed revision